JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 3, 2020

A- de 2020

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Solicitud De Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • No asumir solicitud de cumplimiento de sentencia
  • Se remite al juez de primera instancia solicitud de cumplimiento de tutela
Cumplimiento Fallo De Tutela
  • Competencia de juez de primera instancia y por excepción de la Corte Constitucional
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de cumplimiento de la sentencia T-500/17.

La Corte recuerda que la verificación del cumplimiento a las órdenes de tutela y/o la tramitación del respectivo incidente de desacato a que hubiera lugar, son del resorte de la autoridad judicial que funja como primera instancia.

En virtud de lo anterior, se ordena remitir la petición formulada en el presente caso a la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior de Bogotá, para que proceda de inmediato a impartirle el trámite pertinente.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Octava de Revision de la Corte Constitucional
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Por Secretaria, REMITASE la solicitud formulada por el ciudadano IVAN DARIO GUTIERREZ ROJAS al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogota, Sala Penal, para que, como juez de unica instancia de la sentencia T-500 de 2017, proceda de inmediato a impartirle el tramite pertinente, de acuerdo con lo senalado en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.